home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 94 15:04 BST-1
- From: ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk (Ofir Gal)
- Subject: Re: Digest
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- Message-Id: <memo.825953@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- millert@cs.csee.usf.edu said:
- >evnt_multi. But since you can't use evnt_multi anyway, there's no point
- >in arguing about it. However, since my library doesn't use wind_update
- >(since it's not using VDI, it doesn't need to, plus a developer is
-
- What are you using if not the VDI? And you should always use
- wind_update().
-
- >You seem to have the attitude that what you say is correct and what I say
- >is NOT, simply because you disagree with me.
-
- It's not a case of correct or not, it's a case of a standard which the
- majority prefers. Thta's what we have a vote for. And yes I would have
- abandoned the idea of a standard if there was a majority for your
- suggestion. Unlike you, I did not use this fact to push my point of view.
-
- I'm afraid I reached a point where I don't read your full message. I have
- asked you countless times to get off this CTRL+A nonsense and you refuse.
- You had your say and there's no point continuing the discussion.
- I must let you know that I have stopped reading your message from the
- point CTRL+A is mentioned. I'm probably not the only one.
-
- Bye,
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ofir ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-